21,000
Troops To Become The Latest Guinea Pigs For Pentagon
by William Lewis | writer, Take
Back Washington
On January 10, 2007,
President Bush unveiled his “New Way Forward in Iraq.” [1] He admitted that the American people find the present
situation in Iraq unacceptable. Yet,
in spite of it all, he has committed another 21,000 plus U.S. troops who
will march off to Iraq to fight a corporate war that many Americans now
perceive as being driven by big oil profits and industrial war profiteers. Bush’s “New Way Forward” will unavoidably translate to
an “Old Way Backward” for soldiers deployed to the Persian Gulf.
By sending additional soldiers to Iraq, the president of the United
States is adding 21,000 names to the list of those afflicted with depleted
uranium poisoning due to simple environmental contamination. Americans
must come to understand that the Pentagon’s use of radioactive weaponry
on the battlefield over the past two decades is tantamount to officially
sponsored involuntary human experimentation.
Human experimentation by
the United States military complex is nothing new.
Declassified documents dating back six decades have exposed
hundreds of questionable and illegal programs sponsored by the Department
of Defense. It wasn’t until
the summer of 1975 that congressional hearings revealed to the public for
the first time that the C.I.A. and the D.o.D. had conducted experiments on
both consenting and unwitting human subjects as part of an extensive
program to influence and control human behavior through the use of
psychoactive drugs. MKULTRA
was just one of about 160 mind control programs that the United States
government was sponsoring in the late 1950’s. [2]
These projects were only the tip of the iceberg.
The public would later learn of atomic vets exposed to radioactive
atomic blasts [3]; the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, in which 64% of the men
“studied” died from syphilis or complications arising thereof [4]; and
open air testing, where U.S. military were allowed to spray large U.S.
cities with biological agents for the purpose of studying infection
delivery patterns.
However, in 1991 the
Department of Defense would take mass experimentation to a whole new level
with the introduction of depleted uranium (DU) munitions on the
battlefield. This bold
decision would forever change the meaning of the term “nuclear war.”
It’s important to understand that the Department of Defense was
aware of the deadly effects of radioactive weaponry and clearly
recommended its development as a “poison gas warfare weapon” in a 1943
declassified Army memo to Brigadier General L. R. Groves, known now simply
as the "Groves Memorandum."
This is the earliest known reference to the weapons that would
later become the military’s number one choice for killing tanks in the
theatre of war. [5,6]
For almost two decades, on
the rolling sand dunes of Iraq, among the many strewn and shattered
remnants of destroyed enemy tanks, our troops have continually inhaled air
contaminated with microscopic radioactive dust particles from the reckless
and open use of depleted uranium munitions.
Dr. Doug Rokke, a US Army Health Physicist and Nuclear Medicine
Sciences Officer, whose team was in charge of battlefield decontamination
during the first Gulf War, states that his team received direct
memorandums from the Department of the Army and other Department of
Defense Officials, which plainly verified his own research; depleted
uranium munitions were a serious health threat due to contamination. [7]
Because of the Department
of Defense's direct concern over the health and environmental effects of
DU, Dr. Rokke discloses that he was asked to misrepresent his research and
falsify an official report so that uranium munitions could always be used
on the battlefield by U.S. forces. According
to his own research, and that performed by the Army Environmental Policy
Institute [8], uranium munitions cannot be cleaned up. In fact, the
United Nations Sub-Commission on Human Rights ruled that uranium munitions
are an illegal weapon because they kill indiscriminately, they cannot be
cleaned up, and they contaminate the environment for 4.5 billion years.
[9]
The intentions of our
military leaders, past and present, are becoming all too clear for those
who take the effort to observe these atrocities with unfiltered eyes and
yet Gulf War exposures do not stop there. On
the battlefield of Iraq our service personnel were exposed to chemical and
biological weapons supplied to the Iraqis by the U.S. military with the
full blessing of our Congress.
Little known to most Americans, and almost completely unreported in
the mainstream press, is that chemical and biological exposures from the
1992 demolition of Khamisiyah and similar massive bunker sites in Iraq
have now been determined to have caused permanent neurological damage in
over 300,000 Gulf War veterans, who are now classified as permanently
disabled by the VA. [10]
During the Khamisiyah
event, thousands of U.S. troops were tasked with rigging hundreds of
"Wal-Mart sized" ammunitions bunkers with explosives in order to
destroy physical evidence that countries such as Great Britain, Russia,
Jordan, and the United States had illegally sold weapons of mass
destruction to the Iraqis. U.S. servicemen working inside the
bunkers during the initial engineering phase captured footage of these
illegal weapons on videotape. This footage appears in the
award-winning documentary "Beyond Treason" [11] along with an
impressive number of other incriminating documents obtained from the
Pentagon under the Freedom of Information Act, which effectively describe
the unlawful mindset and treasonous actions of some of our highest
military leaders.
Conceivably, the largest
experiment of all was requiring our servicemen and women to receive the
experimental anthrax vaccine. During
the first Gulf War, our service personnel were inoculated with
experimental vaccines containing aluminum hydroxide, mercury, and squalene.
It was done in hast and without proper approval from the F.D.A.
U.S. Army Reserve Spc.
Rachael Lacy, 22, is a casualty of the Pentagon’s compulsory anthrax
vaccination program. She died
in 2003 after receiving the anthrax and smallpox inoculations.
After a coroner ruled that the shots contributed to her death, the
Defense Department was finally forced to admit that two independent panels
of medical experts had concluded that the vaccinations could very well
have caused the illness that killed Specialist Lacy.
According to the “Vaccine Risk Awareness Network,” adverse reactions to the anthrax vaccine range from 40% in
men to 70% in women and symptoms can range from severe bone and joint
pain, to loss of vision, severe skin problems, blackouts and loss of
consciousness, grand mal seizures, internal organ problems, ALS, multiple
sclerosis -- and death. [12]
Perhaps the most damaging
law pertaining to experimentation on soldiers without informed consent
comes under the Clinton administration in the form of E.O. 13139. [13]
This Executive Order requires military personnel to receive experimental vaccines not approved by
the F.D.A. and denies
soldiers the right to refuse experimental vaccines. This law treats U.S. servicemen as if they were experimental
guinea pigs with no more rights than the average lab rat.
Past experiments conducted at Fort Detrick chemical and biological
warfare center in Maryland, showed that nine of the twenty-seven anthrax
strains tested killed 50 percent of the vaccinated subjects.
[14] With
those kinds of odds, would you join the military these days?
To summarize, the U.S. Department of Defense paid for the development and
manufacture of DU weapons, which through their own research was known to
be deadly to the very troops using them on the battlefield.
Our troops were knowingly exposed to deadly chemical and biological
weapons in the theatre of operations during Operation Desert Storm.
They are inoculated with drugs that are known to have serious and
deadly side effects, none of which have been approved by the F.D.A.
They are told by the V.A. that they suffer from posttraumatic
stress disorder and prescribed medications that deal solely with the
symptoms and offer no valid treatments for their illnesses.
Their spouses and children are stricken by many of the same
debilitating symptoms and health problems, yet the Department of Defense
continues to stonewall and deny.
Now that we have a good
understanding of all the facts, what can we do?
Whether we scream this from the rooftops for all to hear or bury
our heads further in the sand is the test by which all Americans will be
measured. Americans must take
leadership roles in transforming this government into one that holds its
leaders accountable for the crimes that they have committed against the
people of the United States and the global community at large.
How much longer will the citizens of this country tolerate the
clear and present danger of our U.S. service personnel at the hands of the
U.S. military establishment? One
thing is clear. Officials at
the Department of Defense are guilty of no less than treason and should be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law to serve as a warning to all
future generations. These
actions will not be tolerated.
That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is
the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
Safety and Happiness."
– Declaration of Independence
Endnotes:
[1]
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070110-7.html
[2]
www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/index.htm
[3]
www.naav.com/
[4]
www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/tuskegee/time.htm
[5]
www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/small/mb03.htm
[6]
www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Trinity/Groves.shtml
[7]
www.traprockpeace.org/depleteduranium.html
[8]
www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/du.html
[9]
http://nucnews.net/2000/du/99du/990831dw.htm
[10]
www.gulflink.osd.mil/khamisiyah_ii/
[11]
www.bridgestonemediagroup.com/beyondtreason.html
[12]
www.vran.org
[13]
www.anthraxvaccine.org/Testimony.pdf
[14]
www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_42_15/ai_57770428
Permission is granted to reprint this article in its entirety without alteration