ORDER BY U.S. MAIL
Ordering In Other Countries:
"When we set out to make 911 In Plane Site, we simply wanted to make a quality film that presented new evidence. We had no idea that it would become an overnight hit with so many people around the world and were certainly unaware that so many people would call it the #1 film exposing September 11th."
"There's something to be said for simplicity. Just show people the evidence and let them make up their own minds. Besides, it's hard to argue with video evidence. It speaks for itself."
"Soon after the Director's Cut was released, clips from the film started showing up on CNN and FOX News. That's when a lot of politicians and the military community started to pay careful attention to the evidence that was being presented."
More Photos Click Here
Plane Site: Director's Cut
DOWNLOAD THE TRAILER
Why were America and the world never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole. Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not collapse until almost 30 minutes after the initial impact. These photographs and video footage speak for themselves.
Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a plane over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon? Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's upper floors where the tail section would have hit? Close-ups of this section are extremely revealing.
“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing
sound. I was convinced it was a missile.
It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.”
In the aftermath, it was reported by media sources that a giant 100 ft.
crater was plowed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the result of a
powerful airliner crash? Why does photographic evidence
overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the case? Why no
crater? Why no skid marks? Why no burn marks? Why was
the entire world deliberately mislead? Examine the video and
photographic evidence for yourself.
At the World Trade Center, why did firefighters, reporters and other on
the scene eyewitnesses describe a demolition-like, pancake collapse of
buildings One, Two & Seven? Hear the outrageous
admissions made by the building lease owner recorded on video, plus
shocking new video evidence helps to answer some of these important
Why were there numerous reports of bombs & explosions going off in and
around the WTC before any buildings had collapsed? Hear & see
the testimony of the reporters, rescue teams and eyewitnesses who tell a
different story of potential demolition charges, unexplained explosions,
and vehicles loaded with explosives as reported on live television the
morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
What people are saying about 911 In Plane Site:
- Thought provoking - Raises serious questions about the government's
honesty in conducting the 9-11 investigation"
in America should see this video."
awesome. This is the one September 11 video that everyone should
is a MUST see film, especially for show and tell"
911 Film Michael Moore Should Have Made."
JUDGE FOR YOURSELF
|C O P Y R I G H T 2 0 0 5 . . . . . . . .|
911 In Plain Sight: A Power Hour Production
911 In Plane Sight: A Power Hour Production
911 In Plain Site: A Power Hour Production